Click on title to see the whole post

June 9: many faces


Conventions in portraiture are much concerned with identifying social category. These Elizabethans can’t have been interested in making themselves the subject of some artist’s sensitive exploration of personality; they wanted their images to evoke grandeur. The more an earl’s portrait resembled a duke’s, the better he’d be pleased.

Eng portraits

 

The same objective, group identification, applies to the War Gallery at the Hermatage.

the War Gallery of 1812 at the Hermatage [ekaterina-voyage]
the War Gallery of 1812 at the Hermatage [ekaterina-voyage]
So many generals (who would have thought there could be commands for so large a number?), all done in a uniform size and with minimal variation so as to form an orderly display. They are individuals, realistically depicted, but it is the ensemble–the imposing mass–and not individuality, that is the object here.

portraits

Of course, nobility and generals aren’t the only ones whose uniform representations are impressive en masse:

Great Purge

 

mugs

[nytimes.com]
[nytimes.com]

Life Magazine 6/27/69 [sajunk.wordpress.com]
Life Magazine 6/27/69 [sajunk.wordpress.com]
Ai Weiwei "The Fake Case" [youtube]
Ai Weiwei “The Fake Case” [youtube]
 93

 

Years ago I saw a small book–“Uniforms,” I believe, was the title. There was almost no text; it consisted of full-page photos of  similarly dressed groups: bikers of various persuasions, gays, lesbians, mechanics, sports fans, groups of teenagers, different groups of teenagers, different bands of bikers, and on and on. We see those patterns every day, but to see so many examples in the same format, one right after another, was fascinating. I would include some examples here, but like a fool I didn’t buy the book, and haven’t been able to locate a copy since.