-
August 20: better, definitely better
BETTER, DEFINITELY BETTER The collapse of The New Yorker as cartoon mecca is a sad tale. There have been bright spots–Roz Chast, for example–but in general, year after year the work has gotten weaker and weaker, smaller and smaller. Lately, however, there are hopeful glimmers. Stronger artists, braver, more original stuff. An unhappy proportion of New Yorker cartoons…
-
August 6: Saturn, one way or other
SATURN, ONE WAY OR OTHER Some subjects are congenial for a particular artist, while others are not. Consider–just to seize on a random example–Saturn devouring his children, and compare the approaches of Peter Paul Rubens (1577 – 1640) and Francisco Goya (1746 – 1828). Rubens is notable in his mainstream work for the literalness of his plump…
-
July 30: Brace’s Cove
BRACE’S COVE The iconic Luminist Fitz Hugh Lane (1804-65) did a lot of rather prosaic views of the sea and ships; a number of breathtakingly delicate works of the same subject, very much in the spirit of the 17th Century Dutch sea painters, and equal to them in formal command; and then a few startlingly…
-
July 9: Bacon, Eisenstein, & Tonks
BACON, EISENSTEIN, & TONKS Similar concepts have different effects depending on their expressive purpose. Francis Bacon mentions the woman in the famous Odessa Steps sequence in Eisenstein’s film “Battleship Potempkin” as having influenced his portraits. Judging by appearances, he was more influenced by the war work of Henry Tonks. But you’d never mistake a Tonks…
-
July 2: cats
CATS An engaging portrait, but it’s the cat that really makes it sing. The earl, suavely executed, and the cat, almost naive in pose and expression, look as if they were painted by different hands. This is perfectly possible; successful artists often used students or assistants to fill in peripheral details. Landscape…
-
June 25: Seurat thinks too much
SEURAT THINKS TOO MUCH In an earlier post (March 17, 2012) I lamented Georges Seurat’s self-defeating application of pointillism to large compositions. But his big, striving showpieces got mired in another, equally counter-productive weakness: his notions about emotional response to compositional devices. For example, he thought that a bouncy, upward-sweeping shape evoked joy. In “La Chahut,” which is…